Sermons sous les décombres · 8 October · Discover
Back

Atelier TenouaTalk18 October 2022

Do you speak fanatic?

1h 34min

The 2022 season-opening session, on an 18th of October: two years after the assassination of Samuel Paty, two months after the attack on Salman Rushdie. From Amos Oz to the Tower of Babel studied verse by verse, a biblical genealogy of fanaticism as a passion for oneness, and its antidote: a Jewish thought that never speaks in a single language. In French.

Highlights

This Torah is written in square letters which, hold on tight, are not Hebrew letters. […] Hebrew is not written in Hebrew. Hebrew is written in Assyrian.

The peak of the demonstration: nothing Jewish is said in a single language. Translated from the French

The fanatic is a devotee of the One who will refuse, in all circumstances, whatever might crack his certainties, cut them in two. […] The fanatic, in fact, dreads doubt.

Coming out of her reading of Amos Oz: doubt, double and two share a root. Translated from the French

Safa means language, but before meaning language, safa is the lip. […] it is also the edge of a river, the shore of a body of water. So this verse, the earth was one language, literally says that the earth had a single lip, a single shore.

The pivot of her reading of Genesis 11. Translated from the French

Kedem in Hebrew is the origin, what there was before. […] At the origin of totalitarianism there is often a problem with one's relation to origins.

Translated from the French

It is impossible, impossible to make yourself a name. No one can truly create their own name since, by definition, a name is what was given to us. Given by another, by a before-us, by a parent, by a society, by a world that gave us birth.

Against the "let us make ourselves a name" of the builders of Babel. Translated from the French

There is nothing purely Jewish, and the authenticity of Judaism is precisely its capacity always to metabolise its encounter with the other, to know that there is always some of the other within it, which is to say room for the two, which is to say room for doubt.

The conclusion, after the cascade of borrowings. Translated from the French

The session

The session opens with the calendar: Simchat Torah, dancing with the scrolls, the last letter of the Torah and the first forming lev, the heart, and this text that begins with the second letter, bet: no one sees the aleph, there is always a before. The theme imposes itself through the news: Paty, Rushdie, always the honour of a text to avenge. The reading of Amos Oz ("How to Cure a Fanatic") draws the portrait: the altruist who wants your good, the One-obsessive deprived of humour, and his literary antidote. Then the study: the Tower of Babel, read in Hebrew for its sound, with three midrashim in support, including the man no one weeps for when he falls from the tower while everyone weeps for the brick. Voices from the room bring up Babel and Abel's vapour, Nimrod as Abraham's intimate enemy, Kafka and the Great Wall of China, Solomon's Temple as counter-model. The final unfolding takes the words apart: safa, the language that is first a lip and a shore; kedem, the origin the fanatic invents for himself; the bik'a, the geological fault Babel wants to fill; the roundness of the idol, from the golden calf to the football; the impossibility of making oneself a name, when Abraham keeps the father in his; the three roots that stutter through eleven verses; Derrida at last, "more than one language." The conclusion runs through the cascade of borrowings: Babylonian months, Assyrian script of the scrolls, Aramaic Talmud, Roman seder, Persian Purim, Yiddish and Ladino. As a parting gift, the Monty Python scene where the crowd repeats in chorus that they are all individuals: the recipe against fanaticism, and Jewish humour after all.

Texts studied